PABLO SCHMID - Search

   		Free Internet Chess Games Server

Install FICGS apps
play chess online


Game result  (chess)


B. Ozen, 2269
N. Wilson, 2121

1/2-1/2

See game 152323




 Hot news
 Discussions
 Files search
 Social network



Go, Weiqi, Baduk

                                          
Search


Here are 100 results for Pablo Schmid in the games.


Game_99182   Game_96295   Game_96294   Game_96293   Game_96292   Game_96291   Game_96290   Game_96289   Game_96288   Game_95682   Game_95681   Game_95680   Game_95676   Game_95672   Game_95667   Game_94501   Game_94500   Game_94499   Game_94498   Game_94497   Game_94491   Game_94385   Game_94363   Game_94362   Game_94277   Game_94276   Game_93700   Game_93657   Game_93655   Game_93463   Game_93166   Game_92541   Game_92540   Game_92538   Game_92537   Game_92536   Game_92535   Game_92513   Game_92512   Game_92510   Game_92507   Game_92424   Game_92423   Game_92422   Game_92421   Game_92420   Game_92419   Game_92034   Game_92033   Game_92032   Game_92030   Game_92028   Game_92026   Game_92025   Game_92023   Game_92014   Game_91776   Game_91775   Game_91774   Game_91773   Game_91772   Game_91771   Game_91770   Game_91769   Game_91592   Game_91591   Game_91590   Game_91589   Game_91588   Game_91587   Game_91586   Game_91521   Game_91520   Game_91514   Game_91490   Game_91488   Game_91466   Game_91462   Game_91461   Game_91460   Game_91433   Game_91432   Game_91017   Game_91016   Game_91012   Game_91011   Game_90988   Game_90986   Game_90981   Game_90979   Game_90978   Game_90767   Game_90745   Game_90681   Game_90216   Game_89502   Game_89501   Game_89500   Game_89499   Game_89498  




There are at least 59 results for Pablo Schmid in the forum.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-05-07 18:22:38)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

Why do you mean by worst atmosphere?


Pablo Schmid    (2017-04-23 14:27:11)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

Yes I have proposed it in the forum as one of the interesting line!


Pablo Schmid    (2017-04-23 14:10:27)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

1.g4 is ugly and not theoretically important. An interesting but quite rare in practice but important theoretically would be preferable in my opinion.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-02-04 12:48:35)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

The Frankenstein-Dracula Variation in the Vienna game :)


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-22 20:29:46)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

King's gambit accepted. Probably most of White's gambit too, Schara-Hennig gambit as Black.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-20 19:20:36)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Llull this is why I have said this would be only for the wch final 1vs1 while tournaments must remain free chess to be fair. Thematic on 1v1 with reverse color is fair and I believe the elo could be the normal one.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-20 18:05:27)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Why would a thematic disfavour Black? That's not logical, it just depends of the thematic! If we take the King's gambit accepred as example, Black is not worse and may be the opposite! Even if you lose as Black because of the thematuc, you have chance to win the game where you have White against it... At least the idea would be interesting to play very interesting lines and games that fear does not allow in normal time and to contribue to chess theory in wild opening.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 23:46:08)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

*in this website I meant.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 23:45:28)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Why unrated? The rating would add a real motivation, if you see, there is probably rarely any good game on thematic tournament in this tournament because either a too high level difference or maybe because the unrated game don't gives enough motivations ("no problem if I lose or if I lose interest, it doesn't count")...


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 22:39:16)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

*to see how


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 22:38:48)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

And it could be the occasion for Thibault to see own Black would do at elite level in the line e4 Nh6 d4 Ng8 (not sure of the moves exactly but Thibault invented a thematic in this one where the Black side is rewarded for a draw)


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 22:32:57)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

How to choose the opening, maybe random in a pre select list, or the whole small selected list, or the choice of the players like 4 choices each. For example I could ask 'I want this subline of the king's gambit" and I should not ask a too risky one because the idea is to try to win the Black(or even White) side while surviving when the color is reversed.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 22:22:11)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Not necessarily, as I said the thematic would be the final test to test that the best corr player is the most complete one, but the qualification would still be by free chess where you need to be at least 2300 level in this site.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 16:25:06)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Many lines of the Kings gambit would be nice and fun and would be a modern contribution to unclear and unfashioned but very risky lines.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 13:16:24)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Maybe a thematic match with some risky opening in the same match for elite players?


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-12 02:09:18)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Here is most examples of my ficgs practice (corr and Advanced chess). This represent a low percentage of my games. These games are food for thought from my own assisted experience against that rule that I call "+1 decisive advantage chess". I believe you could already burn a lot of chapters in ending's book. Most of my games show balanced games until the end, sometime, the "punished guy" could have played another drawing defense, sometimes not, unfairly to me. The game would be more safe, with less sacrifices of piece vs 2 or 3 pawns and things like that because of fearing an ending with king vs king + piece or king vs king + pawn even if the sacrifice was sound and well played. Game 22895 and 84758 I would probably have been punished by the rule in the ending of game 22895 (and my opponent in the other game), and that type of ending in general (piece + pawn up vs piece when the king cannot block the pawn). Game 37122 Shame on me, my advantage in that ending was not sufficient to force my opponent to sacrifice his bishop for my last pawn. This is why I only deserve 0,5!
Game 37920 That king of pawns vs piece + pawn would become lost for the player without the piece, what a way of punish some balanced sacrifices for pawns!
Game 54907 and 20704 That kind of opposite bishop ending would be "lost" for the guy pawnless even if the transition into an inferior but drawn ending was the intention of the "inferior guy".
Game 74870 The ending is perfectly balanced but my opponent couldn't finish the game the way he did because of the rule.
Game 74875 I would have been half-losing in the pawn ending after a nice defense in an interesting unbalanced material line.
Game 74880 the ending knight + h pawn would have been "half losing" for me even if we can't say that I was clearly worse overall.
Game 76734 and 76764 Technichally this game is not directly concerned by the rule but it is very close. I was on the verge of defeat but I have managed to defend stubornely. If he have played well to get a winning position and then the win disapear because of bad play but still finish with a draw, he would get a bonus because he played better overall? The way I managed to defend would not be rewarded?
Game 77809 In this game the whole deep opening line would probably be "half losing" for Black in the ending because of the new rule.
Game 80954 Suddenly it seems that I would have been punished for my defense in the final position.
Game 85106 I did not play specially badly but... I would have been punished for my way of finishing the game!


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-06 18:03:33)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I agree with Thibault.


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-06 09:48:34)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I don't see the link between your game and the stalemate!?


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-06 09:05:09)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

@ Ohlin quite the opposite if the human adapt to this rule and if the computer is not "reprogrammed" for the new rule.


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-06 00:03:04)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

If we think about the stalemate logic, 2 knight vs 1 knight would be a draw by repetition or move limit if there is no stalemate or knight exchange. But can one bishop or one knight + king force a stalemate vs king alone? Anyway this is not chess anymore, many endings would be artificially become lost, for example king vs king + pawn, pawn a c f h vs queen, and many 1 piece vs 1 piece + pawn.


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-05 15:07:19)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

King + 2 knights = forced stalemate. I was wondering if a king + bishop or king + knight can stalemate by force a lone king.


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-02 20:32:45)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I am against that rule. Giving a bonus for stalemate is almost like playing for stalemating your opponent, which is not the aim of the game and this would change the game deeply.


Pablo Schmid    (2012-04-07 16:31:58)
Longest ficgs game of chess

Wow, thank you very much!


Pablo Schmid    (2012-04-07 15:57:22)
Longest ficgs game of chess

Hello, just for curiosity, is it possible to know what is the longest ficgs game of chess in terms of moves numbers? What is the result?


Pablo Schmid    (2011-07-13 23:01:37)
Shogi in ficgs?

Thanks for the link, but I think there is no real conclusion. Chinese chess and Japanese are really "classical" boards games that are quite related to chess, maybe it's not a bad idea to include these games, with the hope to get more asian players for example. If you are not convinced by that idea we could do a poll in this site for the inclusion of shogi, chinese chess, both or none?


Pablo Schmid    (2011-07-12 14:47:32)
Shogi in ficgs?

Hello Thibault and everybody, there is poker, and go, an asian strategic game in ficgs already. I think Shogi, (japanese chess) might be very fun here, this is rather misknown for occidental people and there is not many place where we can play that game. The game is very fun to play and complicated as well! Usually Kanji, japanese symbols are used instead of "pieces" but it exists "occidental symbols" that represents pieces, maybe we could try it with 2 interface possible, with pieces or with kanji like in playok.com
What do you think?


Pablo Schmid    (2010-03-03 14:43:42)
Conditionnal moves

Hello Thibault, I think this feature might be useful for everybody: a chess board for the analysis where we can just play moves and why not put comments with the positions. I say that to be able to find ideas when I just have an internet page outside. What do you think?


Pablo Schmid    (2010-02-24 18:46:11)
Conditional moves

Hello Thibault, I don't know if that proposition has been made in the past, but there are somes servers that use conditionnal moves, it's an useful tool to win time for both players on forced moves. Do you think it would be possible to put that fonction in ficgs?


Je profite au passage pour te demander ce que tu penses finalement du règlement sur 3 fois la même position.


Pablo Schmid    (2009-12-27 13:42:31)
Rating calculation

Salut Thibault, bon j'écris en français cette fois, j'ai lu les explications sur les calculs mais ça me semble assez obscur, alors je vais poser des questions proches de ma situation. Imaginons que je commence un tournoi 2000-2200 avec un rating à 2000 pile et que je fais un score de 50% contre des joueurs à 2050 de moyenne, en théorie je devrais gagner quelques points non? Et maintenant mon classement réel a monté depuis le début du tournoi disons à 2120, et du coup le 50% contre cette moyenne à 2050 me ferait perdre des points si on compte mon rating le plus récent. Alors est-ce que c'est mon ELO de départ qui va être pris en compte ou mon ELO actuel? En gros je suis en train de me demander s'il est intéressant de commencer un tournoi avant la nouvelle liste avec un classement supérieur sur cette liste, ou si cela ne change rien voire désavantageux...

J'espère que tu auras compris ma question et merci d'avance pour ta réponse :)

A +

Pablo


Pablo Schmid    (2009-12-27 02:02:01)
rules of 10 moves

Thanks for the quick response, my proposition would be no limit of move at all to win points, as in OTB chess. Maybe an idea could be to not make winning points in a game where the player did not connect for a long time before the tournament begin as it is clear that it is a "forfeit", as in OTB when someone don't come.

But maybe you will convince me that your idea is better than mine?


Pablo Schmid    (2009-12-26 22:21:54)
Rating calculation

Hello Thibault, j'aurais préféré parler en français mais puisque je suis sur le forum...

Could you explain how exactly chess rating's calculation works in ficgs?

And I think games with 10 moves or less should be counted, maybe not every games but sometimes 8 or 9 moves can be sufficient to punish someone (nice miniatures or quick mates are possibles) and it enables the loser to resign (or be mated) without losing points. An example of an abusive situation: imagine I play the Traxler and I resign before 10 moves if I see a good choosed line by my opponent which I don't like to play as Black because I know I might suffer or even lose...

J'espère que je t'aurai convaincu et que mon exemple ne donnera pas de mauvaises idées! Sur ce, bonnes fêtes, Pablo


Pablo Schmid    (2008-12-08 23:05:30)
Ok

Mais si quelqu'un a joué la promotion sans préciser en pensant avoir le choix après, que ce passe-il, "tant pis pour lui"?


Pablo Schmid    (2008-12-07 14:05:01)
@Thibault

Je profite de ce post pour parler d'un "problème", sur une partie j'ai fait une promotion de pion en dame mais j'ai été "désagréablement" surpris que bien que c'était le coup que je voulais faire, le site ne m'a pas proposé la pièce promue. Ok, dans 95% des cas, faire dame est le meilleur coup mais parfois promouvoir en autre chose est le seul coup...Pourrais-tu remédier à ce "problème"?


Pablo Schmid    (2008-06-15 10:56:36)
my idea

Maybe it's already exist in another form but I will try."The best correspondance player at chess is not the human who has the best computer but the computer who has the best human".


Pablo Schmid    (2008-06-10 21:33:16)
Always the same guy

It's always the same guy, I don't even want to write his name, he would be happy. In each topic where he speaks there is a new victim, he is sure to be the most intelligent and take everything personnally, and insult anybody who don't think like him. I don't know why Ilmars's comment have been deleted, I didn't read them but the King of insults seems to have impunity. If you put his name on google you will see how much trouble he makes everywhere. That behavior should really not be accepted here. I never saw a chess player so rude in my life.


Pablo Schmid    (2008-05-07 08:29:01)
My last message to you

Too much insults. My OTB rating is stronger than yours, but I don't wanna tell you my life. But even the level is not the problem. Every GM that played against me always respected me, so they can be better and sympathic. Before a chessplayer, I am an human and I hope in real life you don't speak like that to the people. No need to insult, I never did to you and I won't even if you did. Now I won't speak with you anymore and if I play with you one day by the server, I will try my best to beat your machines. Thibaut De Vassal, j'espère que tu vas réagir face à un tel comportement, car je pense que tu es d'accord avec moi que c'est intolérable, un tel manque de respect.


Pablo Schmid    (2008-05-07 00:34:11)
...

"Actually you're wrong once again Pablo. I know that you're only a 1912 rated player on this site" Yeah, on this site... I began here as a 1700 (the first rating here) and I lost many games on time or because I was very busy and in a hurry to play a move without checking seriously to not lose on time. And corr rating does not mean everything. I play OTB too. Do you? I would be happy to play with you, even if you seems a bit arrogant when I see the way you speak in general. And still, when I read that: "FYI, 5...Nc6 doesn't "put up more of a fight". It loses immediately to 6.Bxg5. I rarely have anyone play that badly against me in an online bullet game, let alone a cc game. and in the line with 4...Nf6 (called the Mestel Variation), there is no clear way for Black to win his pawn back. " There is not discussion about material, you seems to judge the position on the fact that Black could not regain the pawn, so they are worse...


Pablo Schmid    (2008-05-06 23:13:38)
Jason,

"I realize that Pablo, probably a lot better than you do" What? How do you know? You know nothing about me and you say that... "We were discussing whether or not Black gets his pawn back" Is that question more important than "Does Black have a sufficient compensation for the pawn"? "For example; 10...Bf5 11.e4 Qe7 12.Bg2 0-0-0 13.Be3!+/-" Easy response when I already said that I would play 13..Bd7 here and now what?


Pablo Schmid    (2008-05-06 20:13:21)
To Andrew

I would play 13..Bd7 to leave the e-file open. If 14.Bf2 then I play 14..f5 and I see nothing wrong for Black for the moment. 14.Kd1, I didn't look at that move, it seems interesting but really, Iam not that afraid. RIP? Easy to say...


Pablo Schmid    (2008-05-06 14:33:19)
Jason,

I would like to know how you refute the line which begin with 10..Bf5 instead of your opponent's move 10..Qe7. It usually continues with 10..Bf5 11.e4 Qe7 12.Bg2 0-0-0 and now what? And when you say that after 4..Nf6 you don't see how Black can get the pawn back, I want to say that chess is not all about material but activity. So it might be possible that with best play, even if Black can't get the pawn back, they could reach a dynamical equality.


Pablo Schmid    (2007-03-12 00:23:38)
(repetition)




Pablo Schmid    (2007-03-12 00:22:08)
(repetition)




Pablo Schmid    (2007-03-12 00:22:02)
Haha

Notice that giving a pawn in the starting position is not necessary a big disadvantage, depending of which pawn. For example I do it "everytime" with 1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 (BDG) where after 4..exf3 5.Nxf3, it seems to be a "normal" position, but without the f pawn. And my claim is: White have a dynamical equality with best play against best play!


Pablo Schmid    (2007-02-15 23:32:13)
A solution?

For players like Aldag, it might be possible to host a tournament "without computers", so Thibault would not have to change something in his system, rules or rating..


Pablo Schmid    (2007-02-15 21:03:10)
Reprise du stage 2?

"Stage 2 will begin thursday." Il n'a plus que 3 heures pour commencer ;)


Pablo Schmid    (2007-01-01 00:25:19)
Vacation 07

Happy new year Thibault and everyone. Could you put the new vacation for this new year today please? :)


Pablo Schmid    (2006-12-22 01:08:47)
Vacation

"You have x days leave remaining for year 2006" Ca veut dire que le 1er janvier on reçoit tous nos nouveaux jours de vacances?


Pablo Schmid    (2006-08-22 19:47:43)
another ideas

The latvian gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5), The elephant gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5) The Cochrane gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nxf7) The Frankenstein-Dracula variation of the Vienna defense :) Etc.


Pablo Schmid    (2006-08-22 14:33:13)
Re

Maybe he should have put the starting position of the true BDG via : 1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3, but there are differents move orders, and Black are not forced to play 3.Nf6 in that move order. But if 3..e6 or 3..c6, it could transpose into a French or Caro, but White could still play in a BDG style : 1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 c6 4.Bc4!? followed by a f3, or 4.f3!?; and 3..e6 4.f3!? (Nxe4 is already a well-known position of the French).


Pablo Schmid    (2006-07-28 21:57:37)
..

J'ai finalement constaté qu'un de mes adversaires avait un rating inférieur de plus de 350 pts (pas dans le TER), c'est probablement l'explication, affaire reglée ;)


Pablo Schmid    (2006-07-28 21:39:19)
..

Je ne sais pas quelle partie n'aurait pas compté. Mais avec mon ELO actuel à 1736 max, il faudrait que j'ai battu un adversaire en dessous de 1386 ce qui n'est pas le cas. Enfin bon au pire tampis c'est pas dramatique.


Pablo Schmid    (2006-07-27 03:51:12)
En partie

Il est vrai que sur les 6 parties, il y en a une ou mon adversaire perd au temps avant les 10 premiers coups. 4 parties ont été comptabilisées, la partie gagnée au temps en moins de 10 coups ne copmte pas, d'accord mais il reste toujours une partie qui n'a pas compté, et j'ai vérifié, pas d'abandon en dessous de 10 coups. Je suppose qu'il y a une autre explication, mais laquelle?


Pablo Schmid    (2006-07-27 03:04:03)
2 parties rated non comptées?

Salut De Vassal, j'ai un petit problème: j'ai 6 victoires en rated, mais que 4 sont calculées, et ce, depuis un moment. Qu'en est-il des 2 autres parties classées que j'ai gagnées?


Pablo Schmid    (2006-07-19 22:11:56)
Bug inscription ?

Je vois un certain David ******, 1200 ELO inscrit (ou du moins dans la liste des inscrits) dans de nombreux tounois supérieurs à sa classe ELO, s'agit-il d'un bug? Il serait bien de le désinscrire des tournois hors de sa classe ELO par équité pour les autres joueurs, merci.


Pablo Schmid    (2006-07-06 19:32:42)
même problème

J'ai le même problème contre Muratet (partie 581), je ne l'ai constaté qu'aujourd'hui mais d'après mes calculs, ça fait déjà plusieurs jours qu'il a perdu au temps sans que la partie soit finie.


Pablo Schmid    (2006-07-03 18:37:00)
Problème du temps restant.

Bonjour De Vassal, dans ma partie 583 contre Hanly, je peux lire ça: Clock - 35 days 23:12:38 (9 days 20:48:55) S'agit-il d'un bug? Ai-je 35 jours ou 9 jours restants?


Pablo Schmid    (2006-06-16 18:53:39)
...

Tournoi reporté au 1er soit disant pour que tout soit optimisé. Mais pourquoi avoir attendu le dernier moment pour commencer à modifier les règles? Surtout que les modifications ne font pas l'unanimité et qu'en général ça se fait pas de changer les règles en cours de route et cela sans vraiment avoir demandé l'avis des inscrits.


Pablo Schmid    (2006-06-04 15:30:51)
To De Vassal

Hello De Vassal, when I see my game against Höppenstein n°570, it tells that his move 18.. was illegal, but it wasn't and we continued to play. And each time I see the same problem.. Can you fix it please?


Pablo Schmid    (2006-05-22 22:49:47)
Wiki

The Wiki is a very good idea, but I think it would have more success and it would be great if there was not a problem with transpositions. Is it possible to fix that soon?




There are 100 results for Pablo Schmid in wikichess.











 		 
 
Support to all people under attack    




Social network : create your photo albums, discuss with your friends...
Hot news & buzz : discover the latest news and buzz on the internet...
Discussions : questions and answers, forums on almost everything...
Seo forums : search engines optimisation forums, web directory...


Play the strongest international correspondence chess players !


Bleker, Frits     (GRC)        [member # 1397]

Correspondence chess : 2498      

Ranked  #  29   in the rating list.

Rating history :   2469 2469 2533 2533 2533 2503 2498




Graph





This member has no profile in the social network.




FICGS Go server, weiqi baduk banner facebook      
Correspondence chess

World championship

Play chess games

Go (weiqi, baduk)

Advanced chess

Play big chess

Chess trainer apk

Rated tournaments

Poker texas hold'em

Fischer random chess

       FICGS correspondence chess banner facebook